1.5 pistons

Technical questions and answers concerning all models of VW diesel vehicles.

Moderator: Fatmobile

Swampy
Glow Plug
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 2:18 pm
Location: NW Oregon

1.5 pistons

Post by Swampy »

Hello all- I dont post very often, but I read all the posts every day. I just wanted to ask for a few opinions from the forum;

I bought a high dollar set of new Mahle pistons because I was in a hurry and wanted German pistons for my 1.6 build. I looked all over hell and back and had a hard time finding 1mm over. I finally found a set locally and in my rush and excitement never realized they were 1.5 till I went to fit the rods. Anyway I am building a 1.6 and cant use them. I posted on ebay for $325 to try and get my money back. I guess I will see what happens, but does that seem too out of line? I know, I know, yea- they are not made of gold... and yeah I have bought whole cars cheaper too...but? I just thought I would see if anyone could point me in the right direction for a fair price.

Thanks
Fatmobile
Global Moderator
Posts: 7568
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 10:28 pm
Location: north central Iowa

Post by Fatmobile »

Sounds like the top end of what you can get.
TD pistons used to run for that but I htink I've seen them for cheaper.

Someone trying to rebuild a 1.5 might find them worth it.

$200 and they would probably sell quick.
'91 Golf gasser converted to a 12mm pump, M-TDI.
'84 1.6TD Rabbit with a VNT-15 turbo, still setup to run on vegetable oil.
'84 GTI with 1.7TD pistons and intercooled.
2003 TDI wagon
2000 TDI Jetta.
Josh
Turbo Charger
Posts: 374
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 7:30 pm
Location: Algonquin, IL

Q: sleeve down a 1.6 block to take 1.5 pistons? Possible?

Post by Josh »

I'm about 5 days into a state of sleep deprivation, but I've often wanted to consider the functional potential of using cylinder sleeves such that you could run 1.5 pistons in a TD 1.6 block. The intent of such a build would be to make a most efficient engine.

Thoughts? I've never sleeved cylinders, but know Fatmobile has, and is trying that 1.7 build.

-homeless Josh
-'79 rabbit, getting parted out
-'82 quantum wagon, gutting.
-'84 rehabbed quantum TD sedan, southern rustless beauty for sale
-'82 cherry Westy from AZ
-more all the time; are they breeding?
82vdub
Turbo Charger
Posts: 4922
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Green Bay, WI
Contact:

Post by 82vdub »

My .02 worth on sleeves. Sleeves surve a purpose, when the block is worn past a service limit, or if there is a hole in a cylinder wall, and the remainder of the block is in good condition. However, sleeves aren't 100% foolproof all the time.

Last I heard, 1.5 pistons were much harder to find than the 1.6L pistons, and could be more expensive. However, if you can find the proper sized 1.6L pistons for a 1.6 motor, I wouldn't go to the expense and effort to sleeve the block to use a more difficult to find piston. It may work fine initially, but any work to the motor down the road may require a different block to replace the one that had been sleeved.

You can experiment and I don't know what the compression heights etc are between the 1.5 and 1.6's, but I would just find the correct pistons for the engine at hand.
Everybody else lists their cars here - but not me.

I have too many to count
vwtyp133
Turbo Charger
Posts: 532
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 9:03 pm
Location: SoCal

Post by vwtyp133 »

Stroke aside, aren't 1.5L and 1.6L pistons the same diameter?

J.R.
SoCal
Swampy
Glow Plug
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 2:18 pm
Location: NW Oregon

Post by Swampy »

same diameter yes.
Fatmobile
Global Moderator
Posts: 7568
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 10:28 pm
Location: north central Iowa

Post by Fatmobile »

I haven't sleeved any blocks and hope I never have to.

1.5 pistons, rods, and crank in a 12mm, 1.6 block is a great idea.

The 1.5 is zippy around town but with a hill and a headwind it slows right down.
With a turbo it would be a good setup.
'91 Golf gasser converted to a 12mm pump, M-TDI.
'84 1.6TD Rabbit with a VNT-15 turbo, still setup to run on vegetable oil.
'84 GTI with 1.7TD pistons and intercooled.
2003 TDI wagon
2000 TDI Jetta.
Josh
Turbo Charger
Posts: 374
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 7:30 pm
Location: Algonquin, IL

Post by Josh »

Sorry Fatmobile, I think I must've confused you with somebody else! Some folks around have used sleeves to rehab blocks.

The 1.6/1.5 hybrid you mention couldn't have 1.5L displacement, so why do it? Just to make use of 1.5 pistons that are hanging around?
-'79 rabbit, getting parted out
-'82 quantum wagon, gutting.
-'84 rehabbed quantum TD sedan, southern rustless beauty for sale
-'82 cherry Westy from AZ
-more all the time; are they breeding?
Fatmobile
Global Moderator
Posts: 7568
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 10:28 pm
Location: north central Iowa

Post by Fatmobile »

There were a few reasons mentioned over on the GTD forum.
The shorter stroke has it's advantages.
The 1.5 revs higher,.. but who wants to drive with the engine screaming.
Actually normal driving wouldn't be at high RPMs but zipping around town in a 1.5 can be fun.
... and with the smaller displacement could get better MPG, making it a good high MPG project.

I plan to VNT my 1.5 and tune it for MPG and no smoke.
'91 Golf gasser converted to a 12mm pump, M-TDI.
'84 1.6TD Rabbit with a VNT-15 turbo, still setup to run on vegetable oil.
'84 GTI with 1.7TD pistons and intercooled.
2003 TDI wagon
2000 TDI Jetta.
VW Jon
Turbo Charger
Posts: 228
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 1:13 am
Location: Iowa

Post by VW Jon »

The size of an engine has nothing to do with the rpm it has in high gear, with everything else being the same (tire size, transmission gear ratio, speed driven). A 1.5 and 1.6 liter will rpm at the identical speed.
Fatmobile
Global Moderator
Posts: 7568
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 10:28 pm
Location: north central Iowa

Post by Fatmobile »

The stroke of an engine has alot to do with what RPM they can run.
A shorter stroke allows a faster RPM.
The 1.5 has a shorter stroke.
'91 Golf gasser converted to a 12mm pump, M-TDI.
'84 1.6TD Rabbit with a VNT-15 turbo, still setup to run on vegetable oil.
'84 GTI with 1.7TD pistons and intercooled.
2003 TDI wagon
2000 TDI Jetta.
libbybapa
Turbo Charger
Posts: 2444
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:05 am

Post by libbybapa »

Gear ratio and speed will determine the rpm of the engine. A shorter stroke allows an engine to rev higher. Both are true.

Andrew
VW Jon
Turbo Charger
Posts: 228
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 1:13 am
Location: Iowa

Post by VW Jon »

My point is, the final rpm at an identical speed will be the same regardless of the size of the engine, all other factors being the same.
libbybapa
Turbo Charger
Posts: 2444
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:05 am

Post by libbybapa »

I know that's your point and it is correct, but it doesn't have any bearing on Fatmobile's statement that a shorter stroke allows for an engine that can rev higher which is also correct.

Andrew
VW Jon
Turbo Charger
Posts: 228
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 1:13 am
Location: Iowa

Post by VW Jon »

I've driven both 1.5 and 1.6 liter engines, and there is no need to spin the 1.5 liter any higher to get up to cruising speed. Just because an engine is smaller, doesn't necessitate revving it higher before you shift.
Post Reply